Suraja Kumar Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 32721 of 2022 Suraja Kumar Nayak and others .....

Petitioners Mr. G. Mishra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

08.12.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to regularize their service as Lecturers (Asst. Professors) in Biology forthwith by quashing the advertisement under Annexure-2. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioners have made a representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-6 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same, taking into account Annexure-5 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.2 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-6, taking into account Annexures-5 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioners. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)