Ramesh Ch.Prusty v. Bainchuan, Balianta, Khurda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 33224 of 2022 Ramesh Ch. Prusty and another .....

Petitioners Mr. N. Biswal, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.12.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking to quash the eviction notice under Annexure-4.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states challenging the order passed under Annexure-4, the petitioners have already filed the appeal before opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-6 and direction may be given to consider and dispose of the same within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.3 to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)