Janmejay Mallick v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 39706 of 2021 Janmejay Mallick .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dasmohapatra, Advocate Vs.

Union of India and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

11.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to extend 1/3rd of service benefits and residual benefits of his deceased father.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made a representation to opposite party No.3 vide Annexures-7 and 9 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time. 5.

Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexures-7 and 9, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of the authenticated/certified copy this order.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy,

subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)