Parina Say v. State Of Odisha(Vig.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLREV No. 521 of 2021 Parina Say ....

Petitioner Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Adv.

- Versus - State of Odisha (Vig.) ....

Opp.Party Mr. Sangram Das, Standing Counsel for Vigilance Department

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

03.11.2022 1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Order No.

3.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Vigilance Department.

3.

Having perused the impugned order and having considered the rival submissions made, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order inasmuch as the petitioner's application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. was allowed by directing release of the seized cheque book and ATM card of the petitioner in her favour to be kept in zima with the condition to produce the same as and when required by the I.O. for the purpose of further investigation of the case. Since the investigation is in progress, it is incumbent upon the accused to cooperate with the investigating agency. To such extent, no fault can be attributed to learned court below for imposing the aforesaid condition.

4.

The CRLREV is therefore, dismissed.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge A.K. Rana