Amarpreet Singh Dhanjal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 2809 OF 2021 Amarpreet Singh Dhanjal & Ors.

.........

Petitioner Mr. Manoranjan Mishra, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha & Anr.

............

Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA & Mr. Satyabrata Das, Counsel for OP-2.

CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

18.04.2022 Order No.

06.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard Mr. Manoranjan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D. Mund, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Mr. Satyabrata Das, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.2 3.

The aforesaid CRLMC has been filed for quashing of the proceeding in G.R. Case No.404 of 2019 on the file of Learned J.M.F.C., Barbil arising out of Barbil P.S. Case No. 139 of 2019. During pendency of the CRLMC with the intervention of the family members of both the sides, the matter is stated to have been compromised and settled out of Court.

4.

An Affidavit has been filed by the informant-Opposite Party No.2 on 08.04.2022 indicating inter alia that the matter has

been settled out of the Court. The Registry is directed to place such affidavit on record.

5.

Taking into account the submissions made across the Bar and taking into account the affidavit of the informant and in tune with the law laid down by the Apex Court in case of Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karkur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, reported in AIR 2017 SCC 4843, the proceeding in connection with G.R. Case No.404 of 2019 on the file of Learned J.M.F.C., Barbil arising out of Barbil P.S. Case No. 139 of 2019 stands quashed, in exercise of power Under Section-482 Cr.P.C.

6.

The CRLMC thus stands disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. ( V.Narasingh ) Balaram Judge