Bharatiya Bidya Niketan (Gurukul), Kalimela v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.34422 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) ....

Petitioners Bharatiya Bidyaniketan (Gurukul), Kalimela & another Mr. S.K. Mallick, Advocate -versusState of Odisha &others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Sharma, Additional Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No.

ORDER

21.12.2022 01.

1.

Mr. Mallick, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, his clients are homesteadless. They sought settlement of land by application dated 27th February, 2016. He prays for direction upon the Tahsildar to consider the application. 2.

Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the service copy does not have copy of the application. However, opposite party no.3 will duly deal with the application.

3.

Opposite party no.3 is directed to consider and deal with petitioners' application dated 27th February, 2016 and inform

// 2 // petitioners the result within four weeks of communication. 4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge P.Pradhan (S.K. Mishra) Judge