Pradip Kumar Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 34731 of 2022 Pradip Kumar Nayak .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

21.12.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to give engagement to the petitioner in the existing vacant post of Jr. Lecturer being a selected Scheduled Caste candidate and has passed B.Sc in 2nd Class and M.Sc having 52.9% of marks as has been given to other similarly situated persons.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has raised no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing the opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)