Subhalaxmi Pattnaik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.34810 OF 2022 Subhalaxmi Pattnaik .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Das, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

23.12.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.3 to dispose of her representation taking into consideration the judgment in Malaya Nanda Sethy v. State of Odisha, 2022(II) OLR (SC) 1.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3, vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of taking into consideration the judgment of the apex Court in Malaya Nanda Sethy (supra) within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party

no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner, vide Annexure-3 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration the judgment of the apex Court in Malaya Nanda Sethy(supra) within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE