Gadadhar Biswal v. Secy. Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chunkoli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 40830 of 2021 Gadadhar Biswal & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Somanath Mishra, Advocate -Versus - Secretary, Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chunkoli and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties .
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
18.02.2022 Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3.
The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite part no.3 to consider Annexure-5 in the light of Annexure-7 and to regularize the services of the petitioners and extend all the monetary and consequential service benefits or in the alternative to issue direction to opposite party no.1 to take effective steps to regularize the services of the petitioners in the light of Annexure-5 and extend all monetary and consequential service benefits, within a stipulated time.
4.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned
highlighting their grievance and direction may be given to the said authority to consider the same within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexures-6 and 7.
5.
In view the above limited grievance, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition with the direction that in case the petitioners, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, file a fresh comprehensive representation before the authority concerned within 15 days hence, the said authority shall consider and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order, taking into consideration Annexures-6 and 7, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified copy of this order.
6.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Alok