Santosh Kumar Das v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 41199 of 2021 Santosh Kumar Das and others .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate Vs.

Union of India and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

27.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to deposit the EPF dues of the petitioners and allied benefits in the EPF Account of the petitioners within a stipulated time. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made a representation to opposite party No.2 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexure-4.

5.

Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-5, taking into consideration Annexure-4, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified/authenticated copy this order.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner

prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)