Basantilata Nayak v. Commnr. Cum, Secy. S And Me, Bbsr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 35248 of 2022 Basantilata Nayak and others .....

Petitioners Mr.U.C. Mohnaty, Advocate Vs.

Commissioenr-cum-Secy, S&ME, BBSR and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

22.12.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay monthly salary from August 2022 onwards and to pay the future monthly salary in every month regularly. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-1 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has raised no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing the opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-1 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)