Sadhana Mohanty v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP (C) No. 41486 of 2021 Sadhana Mohanty ....

Petitioner Mr. J.K. Khuntia, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and Ors.

....

Opp. Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.3 to implement the ORSP Rules, 2017 w.e.f. 01.01.2016 instead of 02.08.2019 in pursuance of the direction of opposite party no.2 under Annexure-5, and further to allow 1st, 2nd and 3rd RACP w.e.f. 01.01.2016 instead of 02.08.2019, within a stipulated time by taking into consideration representation under Annexure-4. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexure-5, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, taking into consideration Annexure-5, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Alok