Madhusmita Prusty v. Basanti Sahoo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

FAO No.333 of 2021 Madhusmita Prusty ....

Appellant -versusBasanti Sahoo & Another ....

Respondents

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

31.03.2022

04. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard Mr. A.K. Pradhan, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr. S. Mohanty learned counsel for the Respondent No.1.

3.

It is fairly submitted by both the counsel appearing for the parties that in view of the amendment carried out to Section- 16 of The Odisha Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2014 as against the impugned order, appeal will lie to the learned District Judge.

4.

Accordingly, Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the Appellant wants to withdraw the present appeal in order to approach the learned District Judge, Jagatsinghpur. Accepting such prayer, the appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to move before the learned District

// 2 // Judge, Jagatsinghpur. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to Mr. Padhan by substituting true photocopy of the same.

5.

The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat