Mayadhar Mishra v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 41835 of 2021 Mayadhar Mishra .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Dasmohapatra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.1 & 2 to finalize his pension/family pension as well as other retirement benefits of the petitioner as per his promotional scale of pay by extending the benefits under OCS (Pension) Rules-1992 instead of new restructured pension scheme of 2005 and further to allow him to continue in GPF subscription as per the old OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-3 series and the same may be directed to be

considered taking into consideration Annexures-4 & 5 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3 series and pass appropriate order taking into consideration Annexures-4 & 5 within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Ashok