Satyabrata Das v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 41944 of 2021 Satyabrata Das ....

Petitioner Mr. B.S. Tripathy, Advocate -Versus - Union of India and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Sahu, CGC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

27.01.2022 This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. Order No.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to appoint him in Mahanadi Coal Field in terms of clause-9.4.0 of NCWA within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-11 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time.

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-11, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of certified/authenticated copy of this order.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Arun