Ravinder Kumar v. Anshul Aggarwal

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH ARB- 125- 2016 ( O&M) Dat e of deci si on: - 16. 09. 2016 Ravi nder Kumar . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Anshul Aggar wal . . . Respondent CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent : - Mr . Kanwal S. Wal i a, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

Ms. Rameet Bakshi , Advocat e, f or t he r espondent .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, C. J. ( ORAL) Thi s i s a pet i t i on under Sect i on 11( 5) of t he Ar bi t r at i on and Conci l i at i on Act , 1996 f or t he appoi nt ment of an ar bi t r at or .

2.

The par t i es st at e t hat t hey had ear l i er nomi nat ed t he ar bi t r at or s, but t hat t he ar bi t r at or s di d not wi sh t o cont i nue. I n any event , t hey desi r e t he di sput es and di f f er ences t o be r ef er r ed t o a sol e ar bi t r at or .

3.

By consent , t he pet i t i on i s di sposed of by appoi nt i ng Mr . R. P. Bhasi n, a f or mer Di st r i ct and Sessi ons Judge, Har yana, as t he sol e ar bi t r at or .

4.

The f ees shal l be as per t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e ( CAC) ( Admi ni st r at i ve Cost and Ar bi t r at or s' Fees) Rul es, 2014.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

16. 09. 2016 Amodh Whet her speaki ng/ r easoned Yes/ No Whet her r epor t abl e Yes/ No Amodh Sharma 2016.09.28 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh