Mohit Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH ARB-147-2018 (O&M) Decided on : 01.06.2018 Mohit Kumar . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

Rakesh Kumar . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate for the respondent(s).

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, A.C.J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for appointment of an Arbitrator for resolving the dispute arising from the 'lease agreement' dated 26th August, 2015 entered between Sh. Rakesh Kumar s/o Sh. Ram Chander (respondent herein) and Sh. Mohit Kumar s/o Sh. Mohan Lal (petitioner herein). 2.

Upon notice of motion having been issued, Sh. Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent and submitted that he has no objection for appointment of an Arbitrator. 3.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the parties have agreed for appointment of Sh. Hemant Kalia, Advocate (Reg. No. P/317/1976), Ch. No. 636, Judicial Court Complex, Ludhiana, as an Arbitrator in the present case.

4.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by appointing Sh. Hemant Kalia, Advocate (Reg. No. P/317/1976), Ch. No. 636, Judicial Court Complex, Ludhiana, as the sole Arbitrator. The fees shall be as per the Chandigarh Arbitration Centre (CAC) (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators' Fees) Rules, 2014. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE June 01, 2018 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2018.07.11 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh