Rama Constructions v. Chief Engineer Punjab Mandi Board Mohali & ANR

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH ARB- 164- 2016 ( O&M) Dat e of deci si on: - 03. 02. 2017 M/ s Rama Const r uct i ons . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Chi ef Engi neer ( East ) , Punj ab Mandi Boar d, Mohal i and anot her . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent : - Mr . Dheer aj Mahaj an, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

None f or t he r espondent s.

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, C. J. ( ORAL) Thi s i s a pet i t i on under Sect i on 11( 6) of t he Ar bi t r at i on and Conci l i at i on Act , 1996 f or t he appoi nt ment of an ar bi t r at or .

2.

The agr eement ent er ed i nt o bet ween t he par t i es cont ai ns an ar bi t r at i on cl ause. The di sput es ar e t o be r ef er r ed t o t he Super i nt endi ng Engi neer of t he ci r cl e concer ned whi ch i s now not possi bl e. I n any event , t he pet i t i oner i nvoked t he ar bi t r at i on agr eement by a l et t er dat ed 10. 05. 2016, i nt er al i a, by cal l i ng upon t he r espondent s t o appoi nt an ar bi t r at or . Ther e has been no r esponse t o t he same t o dat e. 3.

The pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by appoi nt i ng Mr . A. S. Nar ul a, a r et i r ed Addi t i onal Di st r i ct Judge, Punj ab, as t he sol e ar bi t r at or . The f ees shal l be as per t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e ( CAC) ( Admi ni st r at i ve Cost and Ar bi t r at or s' Fees) Rul es, 2014.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

03. 02. 2017 Amodh Whet her speaki ng/ r easoned Yes/ No√ Whet her r epor t abl e Yes/ No√ Amodh Sharma 2017.02.03 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh