Jai Narain Goel v. Pwd Public Health Engn.Divn. Ambala Cantt.

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH ARB- 19- 2016 ( O&M) Dat e of deci si on: - 02. 09. 2016 Jai Nar ai n Goel . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus PWD Publ i c Heal t h Engi neer i ng Di vi si on, Ambal a Cant t .

t hr ough i t s Execut i ve Engi neer .

. . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent : - Mr . Abhi l aksh Gr over , Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

Mr .

Deepak Bal yan, Addi t i onal Advocat e Gener al , Har yana.

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, C. J. ( ORAL) Thi s i s a pet i t i on under Sect i on 11 of t he Ar bi t r at i on and Conci l i at i on Act , 1996 f or t he appoi nt ment of an ar bi t r at or . 2.

The par t i es had admi t t edl y ent er ed i nt o an agr eement . Cl ause 25- A cont ai ns an ar bi t r at i on agr eement .

The pet i t i oner r ef er r ed t he di sput es i ni t i al l y t o t he Execut i ve Engi neer , Publ i c Heal t h Engi neer i ng Di vi si on, Ambal a Cant t . Ther e was no r epl y f r om t he Execut i ve Engi neer . The pet i t i oner , t her ef or e, by a not i ce dat ed

27. 10. 2015 addr essed t o t he Execut i ve Engi neer i nvoked t he ar bi t r at i on agr eement .

3.

Admi t t edl y, t o dat e an ar bi t r at or has not been nomi nat ed by t he r espondent . I t mer el y st at es t hat i t i s i n t he pr ocess of doi ng so. The r espondent has, t her ef or e, f or f ei t ed i t s r i ght t o appoi nt an ar bi t r at or .

4.

The pet i t i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by r ef er r i ng t he di sput es t o t he sol e ar bi t r at i on of Mr . B. M. Bedi , a r et i r ed Di st r i ct and Sessi ons Judge, Har yana. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE

02. 09. 2016 Amodh Whet her speaki ng/ r easoned Yes/ No Whet her r epor t abl e Yes/ No Amodh Sharma 2016.09.02 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh