Satnam Kaur v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31-2025 Date of decision: 23.01.2025 Satnam Kaur ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present:
Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.243 dated 22.11.2024, registered under Sections 305-A, 316(2), 318(4), 61 of BNS, 2023, at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala. 2.
On 07.01.2025, the following order was passed:- "XX XX XX XX Inter-alia contends that the petitioner is a lady aged 50 years; petitioner's husband is the main person against whom allegations have been raised, the petitioner's husband and the complainant side are interlocked in various property related litigations & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein. In order to buttress his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the dicta of the judgements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'Md. Asfak Alam versus The State of Jharkhand and another' 2023(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 754 and Arnesh Kumar versus State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCR 128.
Notice of motion.
MOHD YAKUB 2025.01.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CRM-M-31-2025 On asking of the Court, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Adjourned to 23.01.2025.
The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 10.01.2025 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to her furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the petitioner shall join the investigation. She shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023."
3.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Lakhwinder Singh, at the very outset, informs the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required.
4.
In view of the statement of learned State counsel, order dated 07.01.2025 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973). 5.
The petition stands disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 23.01.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.01.27 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh