M/S Mittal Construction Company v. Union Of India And Others




    
       !"# $% Date of Decision: 12.10.2018 M/s Mittal Construction Company .....Petitioner versus Union of India and another .....Respondents   $&  '($

 )
*
)$


+
  )
    Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Neha Anand Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondent*Railways.

**** *
)$


+  #,% Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the applicant* petitioner.

A perusal of the order sheet goes to show that ever since the notices were issued, the proceedings have only been adjourned and it appears that no one appears on behalf of the applicant*petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent*Railways states that he has no instructions in the matter. It appears that either of the parties are not interested in prosecuting the proceedings with diligence. The petition accordingly stands dismissed for want of prosecution.








 






  










Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No√ Ravinder Sharma 2018.10.16 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document