Mittal Construction Unit v. Rohtak Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. And ORS.

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Ar bi t r at i on Case No. 213 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 09. 02. 2018 Mi t t al Const r uct i on Uni t .... . Pet i t i oner ver sus Roht ak Cooper at i ve Sugar Mi l l s Li mi t ed and ot her s . . . . . Respondent s CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent :

Mr . Ni khi l Handu and Mr . Ami t Gupt a, Advocat es f or t he pet i t i oner Mr . Ani l Ghangas, Advocat e f or r espondent Nos. 1 and 2 . .

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE( Or al ) :

Thi s i s an appl i cat i on under sect i on 11( 6( C) of t he Ar bi t r at i on and Conci l i at i on Act , 1996, f or r ef er r i ng t he cl ai ms t o an ar bi t r al t r i bunal .

The par t i es had ent er ed i nt o a cont r act whi ch admi t t edl y cont ai ns an ar bi t r at i on cl ause. Di sput es and di f f er ences havi ng ar i sen bet ween t he par t i es, t he pet i t i oner i nvoked t he ar bi t r at i on agr eement . The pet i t i oner r equest ed t he Regi st r ar , Co- oper at i ve Soci et y bei ng t he per sona desi gnat a t o appoi nt an Ar bi t r at or . The Regi st r ar , by a l et t er dat ed 28. 09. 2016 decl i ned t o nomi nat e t he Ar bi t r at or st at i ng he had no j ur i sdi ct i on t o do so. 3.

I n t he ci r cumst ances, t he pet i t i on i s di sposed of by appoi nt i ng Shr i D. S. Sheor an, f or mer Di st r i ct & Sessi ons Judge, Har yana, as t he sol e Ar bi t r at or . The f ee shal l be as per t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e ( CAC) ( Admi ni st r at i ve Cost and Ar bi t r at or s' Fees) Rul es, 2014.

09. 02. 2018 ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) par kash* CHI EF JUSTI CE NOTE:

Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO Parkash Chand 2018.02.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Parkash Chand 2018.02.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document