Pardeep Godara v. State Of Haryana & ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Ar bi t r at i on Case No. 239 of 2016 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 17. 03. 2017 Par deep Godar a .... . Appl i cant ver sus St at e of Har yana and ot her s . . . . . Respondent s CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent :

Mr . Vi vek Khat r i , Advocat e f or t he appl i cant Ms. Mamt a Si ngl a Tal war , DAG, Har yana . .

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE: ( Or al ) Thi s i s an appl i cat i on under sect i on 11( 6) of t he Ar bi t r at i on & Conci l i at i on Act , 1996, f or appoi nt ment of a sol e Ar bi t r at or .

2.

The par t i es had ent er ed i nt o an agr eement . The same admi t t edl y cont ai ns an ar bi t r at i on cl ause.

Di sput es and di f f er ences have ar i sen bet ween t he par t i es. The r espondent s cl ai m t hat t he appl i cant , i n f act , car r i ed out t he wor k onl y of t he val ue of about Rs. 38. 50 l akhs and, t her ef or e, t he appl i cant i s not ent i t l ed t o t he bal ance payment . Thi s i s a di sput e whi ch f al l s wi t hi n t he ambi t of t he ar bi t r at i on cl ause.

3.

The appl i cat i on i s, t her ef or e, di sposed of by appoi nt i ng Mr . Just i ce Raj i ve Bhal l a, a f or mer Judge of t hi s Cour t , as t he sol e Ar bi t r at or .

The f ee shal l be as per t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e ( CAC) ( Admi ni st r at i ve Cost and Ar bi t r at or s'

Fees) Rul es, 2014.

The venue shal l be t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR)

17. 03. 2017 CHI EF JUSTI CE par kash Parkash Chand 2017.03.22 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document