Prem Singh v. Surinder Rani Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2068 of 1989 Date of Decision.23.04.2015 Prem Singh .......Petitioner

Versus

Surinder Rani etc.

......Respondents

Present:

None.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no representation at any point of tome. The Court had, therefore, directed the District Judge of Ludhiana to report on the pendency or otherwise of any case pending between the parties. The District Judge has reported that there is no case pending between the parties as stated.

2.

The civil revision is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 23, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.04.23 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document