← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaARB/41/2017disposed of

M/S Mehta Construction Company v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2017-05-26Mr. Justice M.M. Aggarwal2 pages

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH Ar bi t r at i on Case No. 41 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 26. 05. 2017 M/ s Meht a Const r uct i on Company .... . Pet i t i oner ver sus St at e of Har yana and anot her . . . . . Respondent s CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE Pr esent :

Mr . Sumi t Gupt a, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner Ms. Mamt a Si ngl a Tal war , DAG, Har yana . .

S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE( Or al ) :

Thi s i s an appl i cat i on under sect i on of t he Ar bi t r at i on and Conci l i at i on Act , 1996, f or appoi nt ment of an ar bi t r al Tr i bunal or , i n t he al t er nat i ve, an i ndependent Ar bi t r at or .

A panel compr i si ng of t hr ee l ear ned Ar bi t r at or s was const i t ut ed. Unf or t unat el y, one of t he Ar bi t r at or s di ed. The mat t er has been pendi ng si nce t he year 2003. The par t i es have, t her ef or e, r equest ed me t o appoi nt onl y a sol e Ar bi t r at or wi t h a vi ew t o savi ng t i me and cost .

As agr eed, t he pet i t i on i s di sposed of by appoi nt i ng Shr i Ani l Kumar Si ngh Panwar , Di st r i ct & Sessi ons Judge ( Ret d. ) , Har yana, as a sol e Ar bi t r at or .

The venue shal l be t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e.

The f ee shal l be as per t he Chandi gar h Ar bi t r at i on Cent r e ( CAC) ( Admi ni st r at i ve Cost and Ar bi t r at or s' Fees) Rul es, 2014.

26. 05. 2017 ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) par kash* CHI EF JUSTI CE NOTE:

Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO Parkash Chand 2017.06.01 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Parkash Chand 2017.06.01 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document