Ashok Bansal v. Vinod Malik & ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh CACP No. 8 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.05.2017 Ashok Bansal ... Appellant(s)

Versus

Vinod Malik ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shekher Dhawan.

Present:

Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3.

Mahesh Grover, J.

CM-10549-CII-2017 Application is allowed as prayed for.

Reply, filed on behalf of respondent No.1, is taken on record. CACP-8-2016 The instant appeal, which is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 3.3.2016, in exercise of the contempt jurisdiction holding the appellant guilty of contempt of Court, has largely been rendered infructuous on account of the appellant's subsequent action in removing the violations to bring the building in conformity with the building plans. We construe this action of the appellant as a purge of the Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.05.11 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CACP No. 8 of 2016 (O&M) contempt and therefore, while disposing of the appeal having become infructuous, discharge the Rule against the appellant. (Mahesh Grover) Judge (Shekher Dhawan) Judge May 10, 2017 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Kumar Bhardwaj 2017.05.11 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document