Sumitra Mehta v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 92-2019 Date of decision : 14.05.2019 Sumitra Mehta .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Learned State counsel at the very outset submits that out of 03 options given by the petitioner i.e Fatehabad, Karnal and Yamunanagar, the petitioner has been posted in Karnal during the pendency of the writ petition and he has joined the same on 25.03.2019.

In view of the above factual position, the present petition stands dismissed.

May 14, 2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2019.05.16 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh