Rajiv Ahuja v. B.S. Bains & ANR

COCP No.2566 of 2013 Baldev Singh Manhas Ravneet Kaur Mr.S.S. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate For respondent No.2.

On the last date of hearing, an undertaking was given by learned counsel appearing for the State and the University that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 1791 of 2012 shall be brought to the notice of the Chancellor, Punjabi University, Patiala i.e. Hon'ble Governor of the State of Punjab for necessary action and its compliance. Learned counsel for the State and the University submits that the order passed by this Court was duly brought to the notice of the Chancellor, Punjabi University, Patiala but no action has been taken. They pray for one more opportunity to do the needful. Adjourned to 28.05.2015.

A copy of this order be given to the State counsel as well as to the counsel for the Punjabi University, Patiala for compliance, under the signatures of the Special Secretary.

COCP No.2813 of 2013 Kuldeep Kaur Lakhwinder Singh @ Dakshjit Singh Ms. Vinod Agnihotri, Advocate, and Mrs. G.K. Turka, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the respondent.

Arguments heard.

Judgment reserved.

COCP No.3498 of 2013 Kuldeep Singh and others Parminder Singh Gill Mr. Rajwant Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr.Iqbal Singh Ratta, Advocate for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent prays for more time to file reply.

Last opportunity is granted to do the needful. Adjourned to 4.9.2015.

COCP No. 3492 of 2013 All India PTU DEP Association & others Dr. Rajneesh Arora & others Mr. Rajpat, Advocate, for Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 2.

Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate for respondents No. 3 & 4.

Counsel for the petitioners prays for an adjournment. Adjourned to 4.9.2015.

COCP No. 769 of 2014 Nirmal Singh and another G. Vajralingam I.A.S.

Mr. Dharmender Singh Rawat, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

On the request of learned counsel for the respondent, adjourned to 13.07.2015.

COCP No. 3304 of 2013 (O&M) Balraj & others Kishan Partap Mr. A.K. Bura, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate For the respondent.

On the oral request of counsel for the petitioners, Executive Engineer, HVPNL (Transmission Division), Kaithal is impleaded as respondent.

Let notice be issued to the newly added respondent. On asking of the Court Mr. J.S. Bedi, Addl. A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the newly added respondent. Adjourned to 27.05.2015 for filing reply.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.105 of 2014 Date of Decision:14.05.2015 Rajiv Ahuja . . . . Petitioner B.S. Bains and another . . . .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the order passed by this Court on 6.8.2013, the payments have been received, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous.

COCP No. 768 of 2015 Gurmukh Singh S.S. Marwaha, CEO Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent prays for time to file reply. Adjourned to 17.7.2015 for filing reply and arguments.

COCP No. 748 of 2015 Rajinder Singh & Ors.

Shri Bijender Singh & others Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rajesh Goel, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondents.

On request of learned counsel for the petitioners, adjourned to 28.05.2015.

COCP No. 379 of 2015 Sanju Bala Ramesh Chand Mehta and Anr.

Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2.

Reply is filed in Court, on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2. To come up on 31.07.2015 for arguments.

COCP Nos. 16, 15, 17 & 30 of 2015 Sandeep Mehta & Ors.

Shri P.K. Mahapatra, IAS and Anr.

Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. J.S. Bedi, Addl. A.G., Haryana Reply is filed in Court and copy thereof given to counsel for the petitioner(s), who prays for time to argue the matter. To come up on 13.07.2015 for arguments.

A copy of this order be placed on the file of each connected case.

COCP No. 11 of 2015 Mrs. Vijay Dania & Anr.

Shri C. Rahul, IAS and Ors.

Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Counsel for the respondents prays for time to file reply. Adjourned to 31.7.2015 for reply and arguments.

COCP No. 3588 of 2014 Meenakshi Gupta Sandeep Gupta Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent prays for time to file reply. Adjourned to 31.7.2015 for reply and arguments.

COCP No. 3556 of 2014 Satyavir Om Parkash Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the respondent.

Service is complete.

To come up on 14.09.2015 for reply and arguments.

COCP No. 3543 of 2014 Jaspal Singh & others Suman Sood & another Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Learned State counsel prays for time to file reply. Adjourned to 14.09.2015 for filing reply and arguments.

COCP No. 1886 of 2014 PM Gupta Satya Gopal Ms. Vaishali, Advocate for Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advocate Ms. Bhavna Joshi, Advocate for the respondent.

On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, adjourned to 27.08.2015.

COCP No. 1800 of 2014 Devender Kr. Yadav and Ors.

P.K. Cudhary & Ors.

Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Learned State counsel prays for an adjournment to seek instructions as the reply filed by the Assistant Director is not sufficient.

Adjourned to 8.7.2015.

C.M. No. 10154-CII of 2015 in COCP No. 1179 of 2014 (O&M) Baldev Raj Dr. Saket Kumar & Ors.

Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

C.M. No. 10154-CII of 2015 Application is allowed.

Affidavit of the petitioner as Annexure P-5 and Photographs as Annexure P-6 are taken on record. COCP No. 1179 of 2014 Counsel for the respondents has submitted that though the encroachment has been removed but on certain part of the land in dispute the encroachment could not be removed because of the order of the Civil Court. In this regard counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the orders of the Civil Court are with regard to the baras and not with regard to the Phirni.

After consulting respondent No.3, learned counsel for respondents has prayed for an adjournment to make a concrete statement.

On his request, adjourned to 21.5.2015.