← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/59/2025allowed

Rekha Kaushik And Another v. Suresh And Others

2025-08-22Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma18 pages

 

!"

 #

!$!% !"

 #

  



      



    

&" '(&))))&                   

 

  

!  

"

  

 

# $$$$ ))&    %           &  

 '

    (



!)*!)!+ 

 ,

 

  --  .

   /**&0

 

1 , % & 

2  3% & 45  

,  , '

  ,       )6*)))78 '( 

 96: 

, 

 

 ,

 .

 



 )- !!)!  !      ,

   

 ; , , (

&0

% &   



      ;

&     &  0

)&)))()() # %

   ,  8  

 ,    &0

% &   (



   & 

%  0    &( 

, 

, & 

   ( +  

   

 ( , 0 ' (

  '0&   

,  ,     &0

% &   '0& '

%  0 

,   < =



    

   (

   ( 

& 

)((*&) - > 4&   ,  1  

       Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another +,

-.)$/

$ 12



3

( (   ,  , 

     ,  

8 ?30     

            

    

       

              

   

     

 

       

 

      

           

  

         !"#$            

  %#  !"&$

   

  &'   !"($       

 

 31)

        

        *            (+,                  









   

  

-  

    

 

      

      

 $          .  /

 

         

                *  

 

                     

  



         

      32 

                   (+,          

     (+,         

         



  

           

             



 

        

   * * * * * *

42. )     

 

    &$          0

 1   $        !2    !(%+ %!

%(

 $ 

    

  3!4 %'#+

 3!'#!#(

 3!(#'&+

 3 !&&!&(

  3!#&'(+

   



   

  3!!(!((

 35 (''+

 34'!'(

  3(''4+

  6 > 4& ,1 

  National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. +,

6- .).# 3  

(

  -- -#8

 -*  .

   /** (

'

   8 6$                

   

  8 9$

       

8 $ 6 

      8 7$ :

   

         

 



 

     



 8 -$ . 

  

   

; /8





         /

  

   ;

?52. 6  conventional heads

    

  

 :/

<*

    :

%(+++       

  :

 !+++++

 

   :

!+++++ 



  

         

       

   :/

  0  7 

 





       



   

 

  



 

   =    

        6                   

     



 



    

   

  

  

   

  > 

       

          

     

        

   

     



   



              

  

*

     

            

  

 

  

      

 

:

!(+++  :

&++++     :

!(+++  

    

                    



    9              

  

 

 )     

               

  

.

    

   

   !+,   

 ) 

 

 



  





   ?

?

?

?

?

59.3)    

  (+,    



 





 / 

   &+

     

 #+,  

  

&+ (+

 * 

  

 (+'+

     !(, 6   

   

 59.4* 







 $ 

   &+,

  



 

    &+

  6  %(,

  

  &+(+

  !+,

  

 (+'+

    



  

  

     59.5.              

           #+#%0@ A  



    

59.6. 

         

  0@ B &%/

 59.7  

        59.8:

  

        





 

     

 :

!(+++:

&++++ :

!(+++

  

    

  !+,  

 C * > 4& ,1 

  &2702 !

28!

$ 2!%

0/2!9(:0:1 ;

2!$2028:2 <$< $201<

+

#, #- ) 3

')2 82;

02, $/ 2-

 2!29) 1<:,)$/ 2-  ( '

' ,     , 

 

8 D216  9

  E  0 <         

  

         

  >    

      

 

 *  

F  F  

   



 F     F  F 

 F F  F  

       





 

 

  



    )  

      

       

  

 



# %!! Spousal consortium   

        

         

    



F  

   

     

 /  F %!% Parental consortium      



              

   F    

   

     

   

     F %!# Filial consortium             

  

 

   6

      

           

  

   

    

      

              22   



 

     

       3 /     

 

  

G     

 

       

   

  3 /                

   

            

 

  

       

 23 3@ 

6  

    

      

  

 

   

* 

       

               

                

 E        

    

    6 6     

    

     

  

   

           

   

  24  

    

    

 

   F

  F   E  0 <* 





     

   :

&++++  

   /    

 &     ( ' -# 0  ,  , > 

  @8 

,

,=

,0

(  & ; 0,0    0'





0 =   

 

,   

    % &     ,,     

 ,

'

,   &0 ( 0

' 

&

 

      0%> 3& ,1 

 

 ',    ;  0  ' 

0&

 

& (  ,

'  0     (

'

, ) 

 &   ',  > 4& , 1 

   Hanumantharaju B (Dead) By Lr. Versus M Akram Pasha & Anr., 2025(3) PLJR 37. %    ',    

8 "19. It is also now well settled that the amount of compensation is to be calculated on the basis of last drawn salary of the injured/deceased in respect of salaried persons and pension and such retirement benefits enjoyed cannot be deducted for computing the income, these being statutory rights receivable by the employee or his legal heirs irrespective of any unforeseen incident of accidents, fatal injuries etc. and such pensionary benefits is not directly relatable to the motor accident. Hence, pensionary benefit could not have been treated as "pecuniary advantage" liable to be deducted for the purpose of computation of compensation within the scope of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. .                   

  Vimal Kaanwar & Ors.. v.. Kishore Dan && Ors. (2013) 7 SCC 476        

  Helen C. Rebello vs. Maharashtra SRTC (1999) 1 SCC 90    F!5 



     

  Helen C. Rebello v. Maharashtra SRTC [(1999) 1 SCC 90: 1999 SCC (Cri) 197]*  

                 

  

    

 

                 F

    

     

  

       



        

        

   

  0     

    3@ 

6  



F

     F           

  

     ;

0!!!!%#($ F#(  9        

    

       



      



     



0 



     

   

 

     

 

  

 

    3@ 

6  

   

        H

     

0     

       







          



 





  

 

                 

   

   

 

  I

   

0    



 

             

                    

        

 * 

     

      



* 

     



 

    

    



6    

      

 

   

   G 7        

  

          

       0          

  

                 

    

     

  

       



        

        

   

                 

     3@ 

6 

 G

    G     ) 

   

   

   

      

  

      



       

$  

  

  



  

     

   

    

 

 

 6 

  



    6   

   /

               

 

                     

 

    3@ 

6 

         6     



   

    6       

      3@ 

6   

 

      





  F          

  

 E.

  

     

   

    



      

   

     :



J

* 

K 0 0 L>  %+!'$50'%4 I  * 

  K9 L>  %+%+$!!

0#(' %+M

  

        



  %!6     



  

    

   

   

   :

!(%&4"  :

#'%#!"

           

      

 

     

                :

 #'%#!" 

     

   C = (8   

 ', 

&

,   &   &    

(   0  



     

  %  

 

  

, &

    0 ,  (



& ( ,

'

, ,    % &

   '  ,0 

'

 '

   0

  

 

   ! A 

  ,  ',  '( 

    

( &0> 4&@1  1 

 



  0

   

   , 0

, 

  &0

'



 & 

(   0

 ,

& 

0&

  #        0       

   B@ &   C671  

  ( 

(

', 0  0   * ! 78 ,  

0

0&

 &(    !<)))78 , 

'0 1    , 0

,  

Rs.43,121/B (i.e., Rs.18,121/B + Rs.25,000/B)     ,

' 

, +      (

   ,  &

'

,

'    %    

 , 0 

,

'     

, (

' ,  

 %  

   

7=

1  0,  &  



0,  < =  '

  

   ',   > 3& ,1 

Jitender Kumar v. Sanjay Prasad passed in Civil Appeal No. 7199 of 2025 (Arising Out of SLP(C)No. 27779 of 2023), decided on 22.05.2025(

1  ,

'      ,

, %1 , D  ,  , @

&,

  

' 

   ( 0 

0



    %@1  ;  0    &

',

  &  '

,

' ,

1%   %   '

  Jitender Kumar's case (supra) 

 

 D!#*         

 

     Birender (Supra)     

    ;

F!&* 

      





  

      

  /      



    



   

      

      

         



           

          

  F

.

14. Such exposition came to be followed by this Court in Seema Rani and Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors., 2025 SCC Online SC 283., wherein it was observed that the application for compensation, even by married sons and daughters, must be considered, irrespective of whether they are fully dependant or not* 



           $ 

   

  

3         .3   



                $  *       





              $  

    

C - =  (  ', 

&  &

0   ,

'     ;0       ,     0    ,



 

  =   



,(   

 



    0

,

  

' & 

'

 

%   ,

'  

'    '



 

     0    

   

,  &

6 1 ; 0  

,

'   

,

    ,

( 

  

0

   

&0   , * E  

% &  ( '0  7#

 

7+(

 @

      , 0

,    (  

% &   

(

(

'

 , (

    @  

  , % (

;

 

'

  1  () / =  ( (

( &0> 4& ,1 

 &

 ',      ( %(



!)*!)!+   ,

 

'0  %    8  ,          

,  ,     ,  8

8 Sr.

No.

Heads Compensation Awarded  0=

,  +# ! 78 !

 (

   @

  7+   )*<-782+# ! F 7+5 # %=

, #!!-<2+# ! 8 )*<-5 +   <

 

0  !6 )!-)782#!!-<F6F !5 - G  B    *)))78 E B@   *)))78 * G  1 ,  !+))))78   +*)))78@   +*)))78@+ 1280/ !

21:!

 #.

.

=

 $%1:! , (

&0% &  

!<2!% 20$!1 

# .

= , #.

.

6#

- !)   

  

  &0> 4& , 1 

Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma

4 6.

R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation ,

- )$/

$ 12



6>   8  ,   '

 

# 9/: 

,  

,  ,

, 



'

 ,       D !  %=

1,  

!

   

,  ,   (

  !)*!)!+  '( 

 ( % & ( 

  (,  

,  0   ', %% & 



&  

, 

,  '( 

 



    ,  7   (   

 +-

; %  ,  7   (

 

 +- 





& 

     % &  !! 

'

2 5

 0  

     ,))&-     ' !!!)!< H   C  

'7 8 

' I 7 C  &  I