Sonu Alias Kallu v. Union Territory Chd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-234-2020 Date of Decision:-21.1.2020 Sonu alias Kallu ... Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Ms. Sudha, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Kanwar Yashwant Singh Rathore, Addl. Public Prosecutor for U.T. Chandigarh.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has informed that all the PWs already stand examined and statement of accused in terms of Section 313 Cr.P.C. has also been recorded.
In view of the aforesaid position, this Court does not deem it necessary to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The petition, as such is dismissed.
However, in case, there is inordinate delay in the trial Court, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again. ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) 21.1.2020 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes / No Whether reportable?
Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2020.01.22 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document