Pankaj Kumar Guglani And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 2990 of 2022 Date of Decision: 04.04.2022 Pankaj Kumar Guglani and another .......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking the making of directions upon official respondents to not cause any further delay in the investigations, into FIR No. 101 of 16.10.2017 (Annexure P-1), registered at Police Station Cantt. Bathinda. 2.

The afore made prayer is, at this stage, rendered infructuous, as, the learned State Counsel, on instructions, meted to her, by ASI Nihal Singh, submits that after completion of investigation into FIR (supra), an affirmative report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C., would, within ten days, be instituted, by the Investigating Officer concerned, before the learned Magistrate concerned.

3.

Therefore, in view of the above, the present petition becomes infructuous, and, is disposed of as such.

April 04, 2022 ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) 'dk kamra'

JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2022.04.04 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document