Chander Bhan & ANR v. A.S. Tomar Commissioner

COCP-1364-2016 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1364-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 22, 2018 Chander Bhan and another .....Petitioners

Versus

A.S.Tomar, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambala ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.SKS Bedi, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Deepak Manchanda, Advocate for the respondent. ........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.

The present contempt petition has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 03.09.2015 vide which a direction was issued to the respondents to look into the legal notice, dated 02.03.2015, served upon them and decide the same in accordance with law. As per the status report, the order has been complied with and the legal notice dated 02.03.2015 has been decided by passing order dated 11.01.2017, which has been placed on record as Annexure R-3. The said order was duly communicated to the petitioners. In fact, the Committee constituted, conducted the survey and reported 232 encroachments. Notices were issued under Section 238 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 to the encroachers and thereafter the same has also been removed. MEENU 2018.11.28 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

COCP-1364-2016 (O&M) -2In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the contempt petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. The rule issued to the respondent stands discharged. November 22, 2018 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2018.11.28 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh