Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar v. State Of Punjab And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 330 of 2022 Date of Decision: 10.01.2022 Satinderpal Singh Dhanesar ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to grant and issue the timings in the joint time-table to operate on the allotted permit Nos. 10/Reg/SB/RTA/ SGR/2021 and 54/Reg/SB/RTA/SGR/2021.

2.

The petitioner claims that the previous time table has come to an end and he is entitled to operate his buses because the respondents have not finalized the time table.

3.

On 17.12.2021, the Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Punjab, had assured that in future, the time-table, relating to the operation of the buses, shall be issued in advance i.e. before the expiry of the validity of the previous time table and the transporters shall not be compelled to approach the Court for the aforesaid reason. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.01.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4.

Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, has

Civil Writ Petition No. 330 of 2022 stated that the meeting of the concerned officers has been scheduled for tomorrow.

5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of. However, if the petitioner still has a grievance, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petition. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge January 10, 2022 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.01.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document