Kuljeet Singh @ Kuljeeta Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another

- 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Date of Decision : April 04, 2024 Kuljeet Singh @ Kuljeeta ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Ashish Nagar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mohit Saroha, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Shubham Mirok, Advocate for the complainant.

*** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL) The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.59 dated 18.06.2023 under Section 379-B IPC registered at Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana Rural and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 19.12.2023 (Annexure P-2) entered into between the parties. Vide order dated 10.01.2024 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 10.01.2024 with regard to the compromise dated 19.12.2023 (Annexure P-2).

- 2In terms of the order dated 10.01.2024 passed by this Court parties have appeared before the court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana and as per report dated 27.02.2024 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.

A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".

Further, the learned counsel for the petitioners, while placing reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Versus State of Gujarat and another, 2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 589 and this Court in Joginder Singh & another Vs. State of Punjab and another, CRM-M-23739-2010 decided on 27.04.2011, Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & another, CRM-M37395-2016 decided on 16.05.2017, Bhoj Raj Vs. State of Punjab & another, CRM-24945-2019 decided on 27.09.2019 and Vimal Kalra & others Versus State of Punjab & another, CRM-M-20355-2022, decided

- 3on 25.07.2022 submits that partial quashing of the FIR was possible on the basis of a compromise.

In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana accompanied by statements of both the parties, the FIR No.59 dated 18.06.2023 under Setion 379-B IPC registered at Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana Rural and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner only. Petition stands disposed of.

( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE April 04, 2024 satish Whether speaking/reasoned : YES / NO Whether reportable : YES / NO