Raghbir Singh v. Navreet Kaur And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1554-2017 Date of Decision: April 11, 2019 Raghbir Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

Ms.Navreet Kaur and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.B.S.Rana-I, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl.AG, Punjab.

Mr.K.S.Dargan, Advocate for Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 26.09.2016.

Reply has been filed. As per the said reply, the amount due to the petitioner has since been paid. Details of the said amount has been mentioned in the said reply.

In view of the same, contempt petition is dismissed. Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has been paid compensation only for 01 kanal and 06 marlas and he has not been paid compensation for approximate 03 marlas. If it is so, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedy as available to him under the law.

April 11, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.04.12 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh