Sudha Ahuja And ANR v. Sudhir Dhawan And ANR

CM-19289-CII-2017 in/and COCP-1651-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-19289-CII-2017 in/and COCP-1651-2016 Date of Decision: January 25, 2019 Smt.Sudha Ahuja and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Sudhir Dhawan and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.B.S.Patwalia, Advocate for the respondents. ........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion was issued taking into account that the respondents have not complied with one aspect of the settlement as was contained in the latter part of Clause 3.20 of the said memorandum of settlement vide which they were required to hand over the staff quarters known as "R.K.Quarters", consisting of four sets of staff accommodation constructed in Kharsa No.2059, adjacent to "Al-Halal". Admittedly, the needful has been done. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press the contempt petition but states that he may be allowed to withdraw the same with liberty to avail the remedy as available to him with respect to his contention that if there is MEENU 2019.01.28 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh some change of boundary and demarcation is required.

CM-19289-CII-2017 in/and COCP-1651-2016 -2Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedy as available to him in accordance with law.

January 25, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.01.28 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh