Nirmal Parbhakar v. Manoj Kumar Sharma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH

COURT AT CHANDIGARH.

COCP No.1658 of 2016 Date of Decision: November 04, 2016.

Nirmal Parbhakar ....Petitioner

Versus

Manoj Kumar Sharma .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Ms.Neha Jain, Advocate for Mr.Manish Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.A.S.Sethi, Advocate for the respondent.

Rajan Gupta, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that pursuant to directions given by the writ court in CWP No.13915 of 2012, speaking order (Annexure A) has been passed. He further submits that all benefits have been granted. As regards the benefit of ACP scheme, matter has been recommended to the Director, Local Bodies, Punjab. A reminder shall also be sent to ensure that same is granted at the earliest. In view of above, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Rule is discharged. It is, however, made clear that in case needful is not done within a period of three months from today, fresh cause of action would accrue to the petitioner. Disposed of.

(Rajan Gupta) Judge November 04, 2016.

BB Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No