Kawal Masih @ Kamal Bhatti v. State Of Punjab
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 18.02.2025
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Narender Kumar Vadhera, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Singh Bhatta, DAG Punjab.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under:
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
! "# $%#
! &$&$'()& &$!#&) *&%& &
* *&%& & !& $*'&&)&)(+%)! &$ *&!& & ! &$ * *&+& *&%& & +& &$ *&,- * *&'&& '# &$(%&!!.& ! *&))& &$!!#
&!& & #'+ * *&%& & &$( /.& $*% (&$
!% (') *&%& &
-2-
)& &$ &!#&)0*)& &&
*& #
&% )&$'( &* )()&$ *&&
#+& '(#'+ * *& &%&!! '# *&%& & *&$!)# & &+& !1 ₹ !!#&$ )/ **. !*&$ *&+')&%*&$ 21 + *&!+%) '&$&'& ! .&)(.).&$ !* *&&
*&0& *&!+%) &#'+ * &!.& ((& '&&&! &$ + *&%& &
0*!**!# $) &
&3# &$ *# % ( $+) *&%& & !$& *& .)! & $%& # *& &! $
% & * *& ,-0 & & &$ *& &+& *& !+%) *
'# 4 0*)&*&0
0 $ ) 0 **0& *& '# 4 0 %& !+&+%&$$ *& 0%& + !(!)& %%&$ *&+& *& &) &+& 5))& &6& *&) !*&$ *& &
+ *&0& *&!+%) $ *& !*&$ *&+')& ₹ %*&) 0 * + *&!+%) .&
&$ * * && ) *& 0( *&+ !(!)& $ *&# *%& 0( *+%&$!#)$ #'&3#& )( *&%)!&
& &$&
)/ * 0*$!)&$ *&+& *& !!#&$.).&$ *& !!#
&!& $!! $ )( *&%& & ) 0 *+)$ *)# 0& &+ &$ 7 %& #) *& &! $0#)$ &.&) * *& &%&!!
$!)# &'( *&!1!!#&$ * *& !*&$+')&%*&0&))!* !*&$ + *&!+%) *&!# $( *&% && %& &
-3-
%% & * *&%& & *! .&)(% !% &$ *&!!#
&!&$ *& &!.& ( !*&$ !)&(& '&&&! &$ +*+
*& & & !$& *& # &$
. (&!& '& .&$ * !&+$&# .# *&%& &
!% (') !&3#&!& *&%& *& &'($+&$ 7.
Any observation made above shall not be construed as opinion of this Court on the merits of the case.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 18.02.2025 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No