Gardhari Lal v. Adarsh Kumar Bansal And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1701-2017 Date of Decision: April 11, 2019 Gardhari Lal .....Petitioner

Versus

Adarsh Kumar Bansal and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.C.M.Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Aditya Sharda, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.H.S.Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.3.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) It is not disputed that the entire amount has been paid except the interest towards the special increment.

In view of the same, contempt petition is dismissed. Rule issued against the respondents stand discharged. However, there is no direction to pay interest on the special increments either in the order dated 04.11.2015 or in the order passed by the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others vs Tarlok Chand and others 2014(4) SCT 361.

In case the petitioner is still aggrieved with the non-grant of interest, he is at liberty to avail remedy as available to him under the law for claim of the interest on the said amount.

April 11, 2019 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2019.04.12 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh