Deepak Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.775 of 2021 Date of Decision: 11.07.2022 Deepak Kumar ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Shailender Singh Momi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 9.

ANOOP CHITKARA J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to official respondents No.1 to 4 to register an FIR on the statement dated 12.10.2020 (Annexure P-2) given by the petitioner to the local police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied in case directions may be issued to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra to decide the representation/applications dated 12.11.2020; 08.12.2020 and 09.12.2020 (Annexures P-3, P-5 and P-6) within a time bound manner. The prayer is not opposed.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of by issuing direction to respondent No.-Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra to decide the representation/applications dated 12.11.2020; RITTU 2022.07.12 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.775 of 2021 -208.12.2020 and 09.12.2020 (Annexures P-3, P-5 and P-6) by passing a speaking order within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, he shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court.

The petition is allowed to the extent above. Pending application, if any, stands disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 11.07.2022 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RITTU 2022.07.12 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document