Rampal v. S.K. Gulati & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-1783-2017 Date of decision: 15.05.2018 Rampal .... Petitioner V/s S.K. Gulati and anr.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Gagandeep Wasu, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

**** Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that necessary approval has been granted for creation of a post of a Labourer to accommodate the petitioner in light of order passed by the writ court. He submits that needful shall be done. Petition is, thus, disposed of. The concerned authority shall take necessary action expeditiously, in any case, not later than six weeks. In case, fresh cause of action accrues to the petitioner to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this court, apart from proceedings under the Act, it shall consider to impose punitive costs which shall be deducted from the salary of the officers responsible for the delay/non-compliance.

(RAJAN GUPTA) May 15, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.05.19 22:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document