Naresh Kumar v. R R Jowal And Others

COCP No. 1853 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1853 of 2018 Date of decision : 01.06.2018 Naresh Kumar ....Petitioner V/s R.R. Jowal & ors.

....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ajay Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of court, Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wassu, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Petitioners allege violation of order dated 05.12.2017 passed by writ court. Operative part thereof reads as under:- "Consequently, without making any comment on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-10 colly), by passing a speaking order within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

It is also clarified that in case a speaking order has already been passed giving such detailed reasons, then only a short order need be passed, annexing therewith the detailed order already passed (if any)." Learned State counsel submits that in case decision has not been taken till now, needful shall be done at the earliest, in any case not later than one month.

Ajay Kumar 2018.06.02 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

COCP No. 1853 of 2018 In view of statement made by learned State counsel, petition is disposed of. In case fresh cause of action accrues to the petitioner to invoke contempt jurisdiction of this court, apart from taking action for contempt of court, this court shall consider imposition of punitive costs which shall be deducted from the salary of the officer(s) responsible for delay/noncompliance. June 01, 2018 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Ajay Kumar 2018.06.02 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document