Nidhi Sharma v. Shyam Lal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 1869 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 27, 2020 Nidhi Sharma ..........PETITIONER
VERSUS
Shyam Lal ........RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocate for Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravi Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Admittedly, the maintenance of son of petitioner as per settlement has been paid upto September 2019. This petition which was filed on 30.05.2018, as such does not survives and has been rendered infrucutous.
At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent will keep on paying regularly maintenance as per the compromise.
Dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE January 27, 2020 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No JYOTI 2020.01.29 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document