Ravi v. State Of Haryana

 


   
 

 !  !"#$# % &

&

    



       




 '

()&)
) )      




 

   

  
   

  

       !


   

    ) )  *&+,-.

  " #    

$   

%&'  ( 

( ) 

 

   $    

  *+
, %&% -""..-..

    

&%/+(!

&/&

&//

&0/+( 

/  1(1

 

&%/+(   

     

 , 3 4 5  . 6earned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody from 07.12.2022. $)      

 

   $ )      

))   

  $)    

 









 

   $        

 and therefore the



petitioner may be considered for the grant of regular bail. 3.

On the other hand,  
   

 

  

      

  

  

) +7 $)          "8

 

3  ".3   $ 9) $)     ) $ 9)  

     *6 

       4, 

  3   

$)     9    9$

 

 (   .:-".-.%

 9)  

  ) 

 

3 6

   

  9   

      

 



$   )$



);  

)    

  $)    3          



)) $   





  

 



 $ 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

It is a case where the petitioner has faced incarceration from 07.12.2022. As per learned counsel for the parties,       "8 

 

3  ".3  

   )  $

9)    

  

  *6 

   4,



3 *  )

    

9 $ 

  

       

  

$   )$



) ;  

)    



$

  

3 and therefore, this Court does not deem it fit and proper to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, at this stage. Consequently, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is hereby dismissed. /  3

   $   $ 

$

 



9 



)      

) 

  

 

     

 0

    

!2      !2   +) ).

  %/,0 *     <  

 =>,

<  

$  =>,