Raj Kumar Bansal v. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP-321-2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-321-2019 Date of decision: - 10.01.2019 Raj Kumar Bansal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Ms. Anureet Budwal, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the petitioner has approached this Court for the release of payments on account of revised pension as well as LTC amount alongwith interest. Further, the petitioner has also prayed for the release of revised pay in terms of the government notification dated 17.08.2009 (Annexure P-1).

Counsel for the petitioner states that for the relief which has been sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has served respondents with a legal notice on 04.06.2018 (Annexure P-7), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said legal notice.

NARESH KUMAR 2019.01.14 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-321-2019 -2In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the legal notice dated 04.06.2018 (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any monetary benefit, the same shall also be released to him within a period of next three months.

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) January 10, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.01.14 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh