Ram Kishan Mittal And ORS v. Alok Nigam And ANR

206(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 1.

COCP-2016-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 20, 2018 Ram Kishan Mittal and others .....Petitioners

Versus

Alok Nigam and another ......Respondents 2.

COCP-1693-2018 (O&M) Bimla Kumari ......Petitioner

Versus

Rakesh Manocha .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Sandeep Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sandeep S.Mann, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Separate compliance reports by way of affidavit filed by learned State counsel are taken on record.

It is not disputed that the order has since been complied with. In this view of the matter, the contempt petitions have become infructuous and the same are dismissed as such. The rule issued against the respondent(s) stands discharged. December 20, 2018 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2018.12.21 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh