Ruhinder Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M-1002-2022 -12024:PHHC:037251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1002-2022 Date of Decision: 14.03.2024 Ruhinder Kaur .... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sahil Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate the petitioner.

Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Dr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No. 2 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, vide order dated 30.11.2021 (Annexure P-7) in case FIR No. 89 dated 07.08.2021 registered under Sections 498-A IPC (Section 406 IPC was added later on) at Police Station Women, Police Commissionerate, Jalandhar. On instructions from ASI Jaswant Singh, learned counsel for the State submits that the challan in the present case was presented on 18.01.2022; thereafter, charges have been framed by the learned trial Court on 01.06.2023; and examination-in-chief of the complainant has also been conducted. Therefore, it is submitted that nothing survives in RISHU KATARIA 2024.03.15 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-1002-2022 -22024:PHHC:037251 the present petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the State and submits that in view of the above, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such.

Ordered accordingly.

14.03.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.03.15 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.