Ved Parkash v. M.K.V Rama Rao And ANR

C.O.C.P. No.2098 of 2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P. No.2098 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 10.8.2015 Ved Prakash PETITIONER

VERSUS

Shri M.K.V.Rama Rao, IAS & another RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

1. Whether reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Shri K.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Pradeep Singh Punia, Advocate for the respondents. MAHESH GROVER, J.

C.M. No.161120-CII of 2015 Allowed as prayed for.

C.O.C.P. No.2098 of 2014 The petitioner alleges the violation of the order of this Court dated 28.4.2014 which mandated the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for royalty and employment in terms of the rehabilitation policy intended for dam GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.08.12 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh

C.O.C.P. No.2098 of 2014 -2oustees. The reply filed by the respondents indicates that petitioner's claim qua royalty has been considered and negated, while the claim qua employment shall be considered when the son of the petitioner attains the requisite age. In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such leaving the petitioner to his remedies under the law.

(MAHESH GROVER) August 10, 2015 JUDGE GD GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.08.12 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh