Harnek Singh v. Brijendra Singh And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.O.C.P. No.2157 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 9.10.2015 Harnek Singh PETITIONER

VERSUS

Brijendera Singh RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

1. Whether reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- None for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjiv Sharma, Senior Advocate with Shri Vikram Vir Sharda, Advocate for the M.C. Ms.Deepali Puri, Advocate.

Shri I.P.S.Doabia, Advocate.

MAHESH GROVER, J.

In view of the order of even date passed in the connected matter i.e. R.A. No.276 of 2012 in C.W.P. No.21084, we are of the opinion that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. ( MAHESH GROVER ) JUDGE ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) October 9, 2015 JUDGE GD GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.10.15 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh