High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/21/2017disposed of

Ram Lal v. Ramesh Kumar Goyal

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH COCP No.21 of 2017 Date of decision: 03.05.2017 Ram Lal ..Petitioner

Versus

Ramesh Kumar Goyal ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondent.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed an additional affidavit of General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Chandigarh in the Court and the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that earlier the petitioner was granted subsistence allowance @ 50% even after expiry of period of six months whereas he was entitled for 75%. Remaining amount of 25% has also been paid as mentioned in para No.4 of the additional affidavit. Copy of receipt as well as amended order is also annexed with the additional affidavit and the same has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.

The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach the concerned authorities. 03.05.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No Neetu Rani 2017.05.09 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh